DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING AN INTEGRATED THEMATIC TEACHING MODEL BASED ON A SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO IMPROVEBASIC EDUCATION STUDENTS' LEARNING OUTCOMES

Authors

  • Muhammad Syahrul Universitas Muslim Indonesia Author
  • Munawir Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq (UIN KHAS) Jember, Indonesia Author
  • Nurul Masruni Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Kenanga Banjarmasin, Indonesia Author
  • Rasida Hairanie MIN 16 Banjar, Indonesia Author
  • Augusta De Jesus Magalhaes STKIP Sinar Pancasila, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Integrated thematic teaching, scientific approach, learning outcomes, holistic education, interdisciplinary connections, inquiry-based learning, critical thinking, mixed-methods approac, educational transformation

Abstract

This research endeavors to reshape the educational landscape by introducing an innovative pedagogical paradigm—integrating thematic teaching grounded in the scientific approach. This study meticulously designs, implements and assesses a holistic educational model to elevate primary education students' learning outcomes. The study delves into the core tenets of integrated learning, capitalizing on the interconnectedness of knowledge. Students are exposed to a dynamic educational experience that transcends traditional subject boundaries by seamlessly weaving diverse subjects into thematic units. The scientific approach serves as the bedrock of this model, fostering inquiry-based learning, critical thinking, and evidence-based reasoning. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research combines quantitative assessment tools with qualitative insights, offering a comprehensive understanding of the model's impact. Preliminary findings significantly increase post-assessment scores, affirming the model's efficacy in enhancing subject mastery and cognitive growth. Moreover, qualitative data underscore heightened engagement, collaborative problem- solving, and enthusiasm for learning. The implications of this research resonate beyond the classroom, echoing the call for transformative pedagogical methodologies in a rapidly evolving world. This study bridges the chasm between theoretical constructs and tangible outcomes, advocating for a pedagogical shift that equips students with the skills to navigate complex challenges. As education stands on the precipice of reform, this research is a testament to the potential of integrated thematic teaching to catalyze holistic learning experiences

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, J. K., & Jackson, L. M. (2019). Integrated Teaching Models in Primary Education: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 287-302.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Longmans, Green.

Brown, S. A., & Smith, P. R. (2018). Effectiveness of Integrated Teaching Approaches: A Meta-analysis of Primary Education Studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 55-72.

Clark, R. L. (2016). Contextual Factors Influencing Integrated Teaching Success: A Comparative Analysis of Primary Schools. Journal of Educational Policy, 20(4), 421-439.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education.

Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309.

Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Ort, S. W. (2002). Reinventing high school: Outcomes of the coalition campus schools project. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 639-673.

Davis, M. T., & Lee, K. R. (2021). A Systematic Review of Integrated Teaching Models in Primary Education. Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 123-139.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.

Eisner, E. W. (2002). The Arts and the Creation of Mind. Yale University Press.

Garcia, A. B., & Martinez, C. D. (2016). Theoretical Foundations of Integrated Teaching: A Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Educational Theory, 18(3), 245-261.

Harris, E. L., et al. (2018). Empirical Studies on Integrated Teaching Models: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Educational Psychology Journal, 40(5), 621- 638.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.

Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. ASCD. Johnson, R. W., & Brown, J. S. (2018). Integrated Teaching Approaches and Student Outcomes: An Examination of Primary Education. Journal of School

Effectiveness and Improvement, 34(4), 489-506.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldan˜a, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.

Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2013). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. National Academies Press.

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Roberts, L. M., et al. (2017). The Impact of Integrated Teaching on Academic Achievement in Primary Education: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 25(2), 175-194.

Robinson, K. (2001). Out of Our Minds: Learning to Be Creative. Capstone.

Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Smith, A. B., & Davis, C. D. (2020). Evaluating the Validity of Findings in Integrated Teaching Research: A Systematic Review. Educational Assessment, 12(1), 45-61.

Smith, M., & Johnson, L. (2018). Transformative Learning in the 21st Century.

Information Age Publishing.

Turner, S. P., & White, E. R. (2015). Thematic Analysis of Integrated Teaching in Primary Education: Current Trends and Future Directions. Educational Studies, 38(3), 315-330.

UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. UNESCO.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. Jossey-Bass.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. ASCD.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-20

How to Cite

DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING AN INTEGRATED THEMATIC TEACHING MODEL BASED ON A SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO IMPROVEBASIC EDUCATION STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES. (2025). Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 2(2), 383-397. https://felifa.net/index.php/INJOE/article/view/156