INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES: MONTESSORI AND VYGOTSKY'S APPROACHES TO CREATING A SUPPORTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL CHILDREN
Keywords:
Inclusive Education, Maria Montessori, Lev Vygotsky, Comparative Approach, Active Learning, Self- Directed Learning, Social InteractionAbstract
This article delves into the application of Maria Montessori's and Lev Vygotsky's thoughts within the realm of inclusive education. Employing a descriptive comparative methodology, it meticulously scrutinizes both theorists' perspectives to uncover the convergences and divergences in their views on inclusive educational practices. Drawing upon an extensive literature analysis of the original works of Montessori and Vygotsky, as well as relevant research studies, this research aims to shed light on the synergies and disparities between their pedagogical philosophies. The research findings reveal common ground in their emphasis on active learning methodologies, recognition of the significance of progression and procedural learning, and a shared commitment to prioritizing the child's individual needs within the educational framework. Nevertheless, the research underscores the distinctive features within Montessori's advocacy for fostering independence and self-exploration, juxtaposed with Vygotsky's emphasis on the pivotal role of social interaction and guided instruction. The practical implications distilled from their respective viewpoints furnish valuable insights that resonate with the design and implementation of inclusive learning strategies. By interweaving Montessori's self-directed learning ideals with Vygotsky's scaffolding concept, the article contends that an enriched and adaptive approach to inclusive education can be cultivated. This study endeavors to enrich the discourse surrounding the integration of Montessori's and Vygotsky's pedagogical tenets, fostering a comprehensive understanding of how these distinct yet complementary philosophies can be harnessed to fashion an inclusive educational environment that not only accommodates the diverse needs of all learners but also nurtures their holistic growth
Downloads
References
Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism.
Journal of Social Sciences, Literature, and Languages, 1(1), 9–16.
Bahmaee, A. B., Saadatmand, Z., & Yarmohammadian, M. H. (2015). Principle Elements of Curriculum in the Preschool Pattern of Montessori. International Education Studies, 9(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n1p148
Bavli, B., & Uslu Kocabaş, H. (2022). The Montessori Educational Method: Communication and Collaboration of Teachers with the Child. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.24.9.1
Dastpak, M. (2017). A Comparative Study of Vygotsky’s Perspectives on Child Language Development with Nativism and Behaviorism. International Journal of Languages’ Education, 5(2), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1748
Dodd-Nufrio, A. T. (2011). Reggio Emilia, Maria Montessori, and John Dewey: Dispelling Teachers’ Misconceptions and Understanding Theoretical Foundations. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(4), 235–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-011-
0451-3
Duckworth, C. (2006). Teaching Peace: A Dialogue on the Montessori Method. Journal of Peace Education, 3(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400200500532128
Eun, B. (2019). The Zone of Proximal Development as An Overarching Concept: A Framework for Synthesizing Vygotsky’s Theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941
Fernandez-Villardon, A., Alvarez, P., Ugalde, L., & Tellado, I. (2020). Fostering the Social Development of Children with Special Educational Needs or Disabilities (SEND) through Dialogue and Interaction: A Literature Review. Social Sciences, 9(6), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9060097
Gargiulo, R. M., & Kilgo, J. L. (2018). An Introduction to Young Children With Special Needs: Birth Through Age Eight. SAGE Publications.
Gindis, B. (1995). The Social/Cultural Implication of Disability: Vygotsky’s Paradigm for Special Education. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3002_4
Jones, S. J. (2017). Technology in the Montessori Classroom: Teachers’ Beliefs and Technology Use. Journal of Montessori Research, 3(1), 16.
https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v3i1.6458
Kennedy, T. J., & Sundberg, C. W. (2020). 21st Century Skills. In Science Education in Theory and Practice (pp. 479–496). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 43620-9_32
Lillard, A. S. (2017). Montessori: The Science Behind the Genius. Oxford University Press. Lolang, E., et al. (2023). Analysis of Educational Messages in The Lion King Movie:
Perspectives on Character Education and Environmental Conservation. COMPETITIVE: Journal of Education, 2(2), 122–130.
Nardo, A. (2021). Exploring a Vygotskian Theory of Education and Its Evolutionary Foundations. Educational Theory, 71(3), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12485
Prayitno, M. A., et al. (2023). A Comparison of John Dewey and ED Hirsch's Thoughts on Determining Quality Educational Goals. COMPETITIVE: Journal of Education 2(3), 156-168.
Prodyanatasari, A., et al. (2023). Comparison of Educational Theories: Perspectives of Carol Dweck and Howard Gardner in Developing Individual Potential. ANTHOR: Education and Learning Journal, 2(6), 725–732.
Shabani, K. (2016). Applications of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Approach for Teachers’ Professional Development. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1252177
Vassilieva, J., & Zavershneva, E. (2020). Vygotsky’s “Height Psychology”: Reenvisioning General Psychology in Dialogue with the Humanities and the Arts. Review of General Psychology, 24(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020902723
Veer, R. Van Der. (2020). Vygotsky’s Theory. In The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development (pp. 1–7). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad101
Vygotsky, L. S. (2020). Educational Psychology. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429273070
