HIKMA – A TEACHING METHOD TO INSPIRE HIGHER LEARNING
Keywords:
Teaching methods, EducationAbstract
Existing teaching methods are uninspiring and diminish the desire to learn. A new teaching format, hikma, was developed to inspire learning and acquire wisdom. Hikma is a well-prepared narrative lecture followed by scholarly open discussion on a topic. It is delivered by a learned teacher to a group of students. A written guide for students outlines expectations and etiquettes for the session. Learners listen respectfully without interrupting. The teacher’s presentation is carefully prepared and well planned. The presentation includes definitions, examples, case studies, findings from research, as well as historical perspective, personal experiences, stories, and quotes. Content is selected to weave a central message. The talk progresses logically and builds an argument leading to a conclusion that the students can infer (guided discovery). Presentation style stimulates reflection and introspection. Students’ questions are kept towards the end to prevent the discourse from being side-tracked. In the second part of the session, a focused discussion is moderated by the teacher. Each student is given the opportunity ask a carefully thought-out question. After the discussion, the teacher reiterates the key learning points to close the session. In essence, hikma is a teaching format based on skilled scholarly narrative and open discourse. Hikma is designed to nurture reflection, deep thinking, and respect for wisdom.
Downloads
References
Alshwiah, A., & Alaulamie, L. (2023). Social media usage and its association with students’ performance and attitude in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(2), 355–368. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2021-0417
Asyafah, A. (2014). Research based instruction in the teaching of islamic education. SpringerPlus, 3(1), 1–5. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-755
Birnbache, D. (1999). The Socratic method in teaching medical ethics: Potentials and limitations. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2(3), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009999523468
Börü, N. (2018). The factors affecting teacher-motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 761–776. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11448a
Canlı, S., & Karadağ, N. (2021). Motivation to teach: A mixed method study. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 227–251. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.63.8.3
Dallimore, S. (1976). The Socratic Method—More Harm than Good. Journal of Contemporary Law, 3, 177.
Gholami, K. (2011). Moral care and caring pedagogy: Two dimensions of teachers’ praxis. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(1), 133–151. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.548995
Kurniawati, F., Saleh, A. Y., & Safitri, S. (2022). How to foster students’ creativity? The effects of teacher subjective well-being mediation on the intellectual humility. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(1), 31–42. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i1.40055
Ma’arif, S. (2017). Teacher’s art of teaching improvement in Madrasah Mu’allimin Hasyim Asy’ari Jombang: Designning the quality of Islamic education and producing characterized children. Man in India, 97(19), 301–312. Scopus.
Mostafaei Alaei, M., & Forough Ameri, A. (2021). Research into Teachers’ (Dis)Respect for Learners: A Cross-Cultural Study of English Language Teachers’ and Learners’ Perceptions. Education Research International, 2021. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2435376
Muassomah, M., Abdullah, I., Hasanah, U., Dalmeri, D., Sihombing, A. A., & Rodrigo, L. (2022). The Academic Demoralization of Students in Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 7. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.888393
Muniandy, T., & Abdullah, N. (2023). A Comprehensive Review: An Innovative Pedagogy for Future Education. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 13(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.315816
Niah, A. (2022). Education Administration Perspective Policy Makers and Educational Institutions. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 2(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.54443/injoe.v3i2.29
Olfah, H. (2023). Reconstruction of Education in the Perspective of Imam Al- Ghazali. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.54443/injoe.v3i1.44
Samdani, S. (2021). Planning Instructions in Class. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 1(1), Article 1.
https://doi.org/10.54443/injoe.v1i1.1
Suyatno, S., Wantini, W., Prastowo, A., Nuryana, Z., Firdausi, D. K. A., & Samaalee, A. (2022). The Great Teacher: The Indonesian Adolescent Student Voice. Frontiers in Education, 6. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.764179



