LEXICAL COMPLEXITY IN ENGLISH LISTENING MATERIALS OF THE CAKE APPLICATION

Authors

  • Zea Jelika Dewanda Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hassanudin Banten Author
  • Tatu Siti Rohbiah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hassanudin Banten Author
  • Yazid Rukmayadi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hassanudin Banten Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22240659

Keywords:

Lexical complexity, lexical diversity, lexical density, lexical sophistication, Cake Application, listening materials.

Abstract

Lexical complexity plays an important role in determining the linguistic characteristics and difficulty of English listening materials. This study examines lexical complexity in English listening materials presented in the Cake Application, with particular attention to lexical diversity, lexical density, and lexical sophistication. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, using listening transcripts, students’ vocabulary findings, observations, and interviews as sources of data. The analysis focused on Type-Token Ratio (TTR), the proportion of content words, and the occurrence of sophisticated or less frequent vocabulary. The results indicated that the listening materials demonstrated relatively diverse vocabulary, with an average TTR of 64%. The lexical density analysis produced an average score of 51.6%, with scores ranging from 39% to 61%, suggesting a moderate to relatively high concentration of meaningful lexical items. In terms of lexical sophistication, several intermediate and less frequent words, including exactly, journey, canoe, horrible, embarrassed, and ambiance, were identified. These findings indicate that the Cake Application provides authentic listening input with varied lexical features and a manageable level of lexical challenge. Therefore, the density; lexical sophistication; Cake Application; listening materials potential as a supplementary digital resource for English listening instruction and vocabulary development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bell, B., & Farmer, D. (n.d.). Oral/Interpersonal Communication. https://wtcs.pressbooks.pub/ communications/%0APreface

Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening, Cambridge Language Assesment Series. Cambridge University Press.

Eko, J. S. S., & Novianty, L. (2023). the effect of cake’s online application on listening skill. Journal of Engineering Research, 10(1), 35–45.

Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning SURVEYS AND STUDIES. Cambridge University Press Cambridge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144

Jack C, Richard, J. P. (2022). Teaching and Learning in English Medium Instruction: An Introduction. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=jKpYEAAAQBAJ

Meylani Aulia, Journal of Education , Linguistics , Literature, and A. (2024). The role of Indonesian as a communication tool in learning. Journal of Education , Linguistics , Literature , and Art, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.62568/ella.v2i2.128

Renlund, A. (2023). Lexical Complexity and English Teaching Materials : English Teachers’ use of Authentic vs. Textbook Texts.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=tVhx_B3a3qQC.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

LEXICAL COMPLEXITY IN ENGLISH LISTENING MATERIALS OF THE CAKE APPLICATION. (2026). Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 6(1), 142-151. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22240659